Exploring Historical & Emerging Phishing Techniques

International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013
DOI : 10.5121/ijnsa.2013.5402 23

Marc A. Rader1 and Syed (Shawon) M. Rahman2, *
1CapellaUniversity, Minneapolis, MN, USA and Associate Faculty, Cochise CollegeAZ, USA
Mrader3@CapellaUniversity.edu
Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Hawaii-Hilo, Hawaii,
USA and Part-time Faculty at Capella University, Minneapolis, USA
*SRahman@hawaii.edu
ABSTRACT
Organizations invest heavily in technical controls for their Information Assurance (IA) infrastructure.
These technical controls mitigate and reduce the risk of damage caused by outsider attacks. Most
organizations rely on training to mitigate and reduce risk of non-technical attacks such as social
engineering. Organizations lump IA training into small modules that personnel typically rush through
because the training programs lack enough depth and creativity to keep a trainee engaged. The key to
retaining knowledge is making the information memorable. This paper describes common and emerging
attack vectors and how to lower and mitigate the associated risks.
KEY WORDS
Security Risks, Phishing, Social Engineering, Cross Site Scripting, Emerging Attack Vectors, DNS poising.
1. INTRODUCTION
Phishing is a social engineering technique that is used to bypass technical controls implemented
to mitigate security risks in information systems. People are the weakest link in any security
program. Phishing capitalizes on this weakness and exploits human nature in order to gain access
to a system or to defraud a person of their assets.

The Anti-phishing Work Group (APWG) is an international group focusing on “eliminating the
fraud, crime and identity theft that result from phishing, pharming, malware and email spoofing
of all types” [1]. The APWG issues reports semi-annually regarding current trends and emerging
attack vectors. The APWG reports that phishing in the second half of 2012 remained at a high
level and increased from the first half of 2012. Figure 1 shows the number of phishing sites
detected by the APWG for the July through December 2012. This demonstrates a clear threat to
organizations and personal information.
Combating phishing requires awareness of phishing attack vectors and methods. This article can
be used to improve the content of existing phishing awareness programs that typically target large
audiences in a “shot gun” approach to learning where it has a broad spread of information for
many targets at once. This approach refines and narrows the subject into a “rifle shot” approach
where the audiences contain less people, and the information is more detailed.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013 24

Figure 1 Phishing Sites Detected [1]

The purpose of this article is to provide system administrators and Information Assurance (IA)
workforce with a comprehensive awareness program consisting of the history of phishing/social
engineering and an exposure to classic and emerging phishing attacks, techniques, and attack
vectors. As an organization, much emphasis and funding is spent on implementing and
establishing technical controls for Information Security. Information systems are rigorously
tested for their vulnerabilities. However, vulnerabilities presented by a Social Engineer deploying
a phishing attack cannot be quantified in the same manner since phishing is more of an art than a
science and plays on psychology of the target. The investment in technical controls makes it
more difficult for an attacker to “hack” into a system. Similar investment must be made in the
protections against social engineering or the technical investment is wasted.
“Companies spend millions of dollars on firewalls and secure access
devices, and its money wasted because none of these measures address the
weakest link in the security chain the people who use, administer and
operate computer systems”
–Kevin Mitnick, Ghost in the Wires.
2. BACKGROUND STUDY
Dante in his “Devine Comedy: Inferno” devotes the entire 8th ring of hell—the Hell of Falsifiers
to people who commit fraud. One of the greatest social engineers of all time, Sinon, forever
dwells in the “10thbolgia (Italian for Ditch) of the eighth circle of the Inferno” [2]. Although
most people do not recognize the name Sinon, people are familiar with his most heinous deed—
He was the Greek who convinced the Trojan to bring the Trojan horse inside of the city walls.
Sinon is probably the most famous social engineernobody knows. This is the mode of the social
engineer; they want to remain anonymous, and preferably undetected. In the case of Troy, the
city was fortified and a relentless ten-year Greek siege could not penetrate the Trojan defenses
and walls.
In modern times the bricks and rocks of the Trojan fortress are present in our Information
Systems. Our critical information systems are guarded by firewalls that are built to keep
intruders out. Like Troy, there are ways around firewalls but penetrating a properly configured
firewall takes an enormous amount of time, effort, energy and dedication. Like the Greeks, an
attacker can test the vulnerabilities of a firewall for months or years and not find any exploitable
weaknesses. The easiest way to bypass a network’s perimeter security is to convince someone to
just let you in. It takes a crafty person like Sinon to convince people to lower their guards even
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013 25
when they are at high alert. This person is known as a social engineer. The best defense against
a social engineer is to have a wary and well educated staff [3].
Many organizations have mandatory annual social engineering awareness programs and training.
These programs typically cover aspects of social engineering such as: dumpster diving, phishing,
masquerading, and others. Typical programs barely touch on the practices of social engineers and
do not give enough insight into their motives or methodologies. The result is that there is not a
vigilant defense built through training the employees. In order to build a vigilant defense against
social engineering the topics need to be broken down and dissected in a way that keeps employees
interested so that the training is not just another series of meetings. The most dangerous of the
social engineering attack methods is phishing or variants of phishing. The reason that phishing is
the most dangerous is the attacker can have complete or near complete anonymity.Phishing is a
form of social engineering that is always done remotely, whereas dumpster diving, masquerading,
and other social engineering attacks are done face-to-face.
This article focuses on providing information on phishing and its variants in a way that people
attending training on anti-phishing techniques will have an interest in the material. This is
accomplished by using historical examples, case studies and breaking down the classic and
emerging phishing attack vectors. This paper paints a picture of the origins of phishing scams,
defines the different types of phishing, how phishing techniques have been used, how they are
used currently and prevention.
2.1 History of Phishing
The first use of the word Phishing in printed media appeared in an article by Ed Stansel writing
for the Florida Times Union and published on March 16th, 1997. The article stated: “Don’t get
caught by online ‘phishers’ angling for account information” [4]. Phishing in the previous
sentence is spelled funny because hackers have their own language called Haxor (sometimes
synonymous with Leetspeak depending on the source). Typically, Haxor replaces Standard
English characters with other ASCII characters. Ypass.net has an English to Haxor translator.
An example of a sentence in Haxor is the following:
English Fishing can be fun if you have the right bait
Haxor: Phi5HiNg c@n 83 fun iF y0U H@V3 tHe RIgH7 8aI7
A typical rule in Haxor is that the letter “f” is converted to “ph”. The origin of the word phishing
is considered to be an extension to the word “phreaking.” “Phreaking was coined by John Draper,
aka Captain Crunch, who created the infamous Blue Box that emitted audible tones for hacking
telephone systems in the early 1970s” [5]. Phreaking is the hacking of phone networks. Draper
was called Captain Crunch because he is credited with discovering a toy whistle included in
Captain Crunch cereal that emitted a tone at 2600 Hz that was the exact tone that AT&T services
technicians used to make test calls. Blowing the whistle into the phone allowed a person to make
free calls. This theft of service transferred into phishing scams.
The earliest phishing scams dealt with stealing a person’s credentials to login to an Internet
Service Provider (ISP). In the days before broadband internet and free unlimited internet, people
accessed the internet via dial-up modem. Once connected to the ISP, a user entered a username
and password. ISPs at the time charged users by the minute for their internet usage.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure2. Vintage AOL CD [6] Above is a picture (Figure 2) of an AOL CD that could be picked up for free at any computer
store and most “big box “retailers–note the “100 free hours” that came with the CD. Phishing’s
origins come from the desire for unlimited internet usage. By compromising an AOL account, a
person could have unlimited internet at the expense of the person whose account was
compromised. The victim would receive a bill from AOL for the account overage caused by the
thief and would have to call AOL to dispute the charges. AOL did directly billed a customer’s
credit card, so the overage may not have been noticed by the victim for a couple of months.
The most common attack vector for stealing AOL credentials was phishing in AOL chat rooms.
A hacker simply known as “Da Chronic” may have earned himself a spot in Dante’s eighth ring
next to Sinon. Da Chronic developed a program called AOHell. Da Chronic describes the
functions of AOHell as:
“Basically, it is used to annoy others, get free service, and other things. You can knock people
offline with it, you can Email bomb someone with it, and many other things. You can use it to
automatically reply to IMs that you receive, ignore IMs from certain, but not all people, and much
more. You can use the Artificial Intelligence bot to greet people who enter the room, and send
other messages when certain things happen in the chat room. You can also use the AOHell Fake
Account Creator to make fake AOL accounts quickly. You can also use it to get other people’s
passwords and credit card information” [7] AOHell was a free tool available to everyone. One of the tools in the toolkit was a program
called “Fisher”. Fisher was a tool allowing an attacker to masquerade as an AOL administrator
and automated the process of creating a chat room that appealed to new users. With the “chat
logging” feature turned on, the automated program asked the users for either their user name
and/or account information. All the attacker had to do was to search the logs from the chat
conversations for the information and compromise either the account or the credit card.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure3. Fisher Example [8] AOHell had the ability to exploit AOL’s free service offers by generating fictitious credit card
numbers for account authentication. “According to users, the program can make free accounts
that last up to 10 hours of online time or one week, whichever comes first” [9]. Using AOHell to
create a temporary account was a small accomplishment used as a stepping stone to capture a
larger prize. Since a new account could only be used for 10 hours, the attacker set his sights on
compromising an existing account.
A more sophisticated attack existed in the AOL chat rooms, but it did not involve AOHell. This
attack involved malicious websites. The way the attack worked was the attacker created a basic,
official looking website. The attacker would initiate conversations in a chat room with a victim
and drive the conversation in such a way that the victim was persuaded in leaving AOL chat and
going to another website. The attacker directed the user to his own website where the victim was
asked to enter his AOL login information into the website. The site recorded the victim’s
credentials for the attacker. Phishing for AOL accounts was so prevalent in the 1990’s that
“phish were actually being traded between hackers as a form of currency. Hackers would
routinely trade 10 working AOL phish for a piece of hacking software that they needed” [10] 3.CLASSIC ATTACK VECTORS
3.1 Social Engineering
Social Engineers are experts at appealing to the human psyche. Their most common methods of
manipulation rely on Curiosity, Fear, and Empathy. A Social engineer uses these tactics in
phishing scams. These tactics are described below:
· Curiosity. Exploiting a person’s curiosity might involve sending an e-mail that
purportedly contains a link to watch a video about the latest sensational news story. The
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013
link, however, will lead to a malicious site aimed at installing malware or stealing private
information.
· Fear. One tactic cyber thieves use to instill fear and persuade a person to act in a certain
way is by sending phishing e-mails, supposedly from a victim’s bank. Using the claim
that his or her account has been breached, the message will push the user to click a certain
link to validate the account. Again, the link will lead to a malicious site aimed at
compromising the person’s computer, or stealing sensitive information.
· Empathy. To take advantage of a person’s empathetic feelings towards others, hackers
have been known to impersonate victims’ friends on networking sites, claiming to
urgently need money. In another prime example, recent social engineering scams have
also been seen in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, with scammers
attempting to profit from the tragedy [11].
Curiosity, fear and empathy have been used by the social engineer since the tactics have been
recorded. Mentioned earlier, Sinon the Greek was one of the most skilled. Virgil’s The Aeneid
tells the story. After 10 years of fierce battle between the Greeks and Trojans, the Greeks relied
on trickery. The story of the Trojan Horse is well known. What is not well known is that the
Trojans were convinced by Sinon to bring the horse into the city. Sinon used curiosity, fear, and
empathy. When the Greeks left, Sinon and the horse were left behind. Trojans left their walled
city and found both Sinon and the horse. Sinon told the Trojans that he was left behind by the
Greeks to die at the hands of the Trojans. Sinon condemned the Greeks by emphatically
becoming friends with the Trojans. Sinon told the Trojans that the Greeks believed that their
failure to destroy Troy was a result of their desecration of a temple devoted to Athena. The
Greeks built the horse to honor Athena so that Athena would not disrupt their voyage home in
retreat. Sinon convinced the Trojans that if they moved the horse from the Athenian temple and
into the walls of Troy that the honor to Athena would be broken and the Greeks would have a
cursed voyage home. The rest is commonly known history and the basis for the saying “I fear
Greeks even bearing gifts” [12] 3.2 Trojaned Hosts
Gifts are a common tactic that attackers use as bait to catch their phish. The ultimate prize of a
phisher is a trojaned host. An attacker will send a phishing email that offers the victim some type
of gift if the victim visits a website. The gift that the victim receives is a Trojan horse program on
their computer. Typically, the Trojan program allows the attacker to have remote control of the
computer and access to all information on the computer and information that the computer
processes. One of the greatest uses of the compromised computer is propagating the phisher’s
spam messages.
Unfortunately there is a Trojan creation toolkit available called Zeus (keeping with the
mythological theme). Zeus, which is sold on the black market, allowing non-programmers to
purchase the technology they need to carry out cybercrimes. According to a 2010 report from
SecureWorks, the basic Zeus package starts at about $3,000 [13]. The scary thing about the Zeus
package is that a study found “most of the infections occurred on machines where an antivirus
product was installed and kept up-to-date: 31% of the Zeus-infected PCs had no antivirus while
55% had updated antivirus software” [14]. Zeus Trojans are typically not detected by anti-virus
and is considered a zero-day exploit due to it being a custom tool for creating unique Trojans that
are not “in the wild”. When the Trojan is created, if the creator limits the use of it, the anti-virus
vendors will never add the signature to their databases due to its low distribution.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

3.3 Man-in-the-middleAttacks
A Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack is the result of an attacker inserting themselves logically
into the network between a victim and a legitimate website. A MitM attack employs a number of
attack methods such as transparent proxies, DNS Cache Poisoning, URL Obfuscation, and
browser proxy configuration attacks.
3.3.1 Transparent Proxies
This type of attack uses a traditional phishing methodology of sending a deceptive email to an
intended victim. Contained in this email is a spoofed URL for a targeted website. The attacker’s
intention is to steal personal information. In the figure below the attacker, noted as attacker.org,
acts as proxy for the entire transaction. The victim is completely unaware of the proxy in this
attack.

Figure4. Man in the Middle [15] In this situation, the attacker copies the entire source code from the original website. The attacker
modifies the original HTML code and uploads it to the spoofed website. The spoofed website
interacts with the source website on behalf of the victim. Following the network lines in the
figure, the victim never interacts with the source website directly and the attacker can gain all of
the victim’s information.
3.3.2 DNS Cache Poisoning.
Domain Naming System (DNS) Cache Poisoning is an almost undetectable phishing method.
“DNS cache poisoning, is the corruption of an Internet server’s domain name system table by
replacing an Internet address with that of another, rogue address” [16]. The victim in this case
does not respond to an unsolicited email. The victim enters a legitimate web address into a
browser. The attacker altered the DNS lookup tables on the DNS server. Web addressing is
Internet Protocol (IP) number based. IP addresses in version 4 are based on 4 octets. IP
addresses follow this format xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. Remembering an IP address is difficult for users
so DNS was invented so that users can use common names. The computer resolves the IP from a
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

DNS server. Resolving means that common names are automatically converted to the IP format.
The DNS server has look up tables to make name resolution faster. In DNS poisoning the
attacker changes the IP address that is associated with the common name to match a bogus
website that the attacker has set up. Figure 5 below outlines the process.

Figure5. DNS Poisoning [17] 3.3.3 Browser Proxy Configuration
A Browser Proxy attack is similar to the transparent browser attack since they both use a proxy,
however, the browser proxy attack is much easier to detect. In the Browser Proxy attack,
configuration changes are made on the victim’s proxy setting of their web browser. The attacker
stages a server logically between the victim and the internet. The proxy server captures all data
that is transferred between the victim and the internet. According to Gunter Ollmann, the
phishing part of this attack is typically the second part of the attack. Initially an attacker uses
malware to change the proxy information and then a spear phishing email is sent to get the user to
enter desired information into a website [18]. Spear phishing is a targeted attack where the
attacker spoofs the role of a person that the victim trusts.
One thing that makes MitM attacks so prevalent is that hackers create and release automated tool
kits making it easier for hackers to commit crimes, but it also makes it easy for non-technical
thieves called “script kiddies” to create and deploy exploits. In 2007 RSA (RSA.org) discovered
that hackers were selling a Universal Man-in-the-Middle Phishing kit where an attacker can
purchase a kit that automates the creation of the spoofing website. The cost of the kit at the time
of publication was approximately one-thousand dollars [19].
3.4 URL Obfuscation Attacks
The “bread and butter” of phishing attacks is convincing a victim to click on a link. In the early
days of AOL it was easier to convince a user to click on a link or trick them into downloading a
payload. Nowadays, computer users are typically more aware of scams and the innocence of the
internet has expired. Most users are suspicious of emails. A user is not going to be tricked into
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

clicking on a link for Bank of America with an address of www.I-am-a-badguy.com. Users can
read the URL and see that the link is not for Bank of America. Attackers now need to find a way
to make their web address look like the real address. Attackers employ many different ways to
fake an address; some of these are listed below.
3.4.1 Bad Domain Names
Registering a domain normally takes only a few minutes and only costs a couple of dollars. An
attacker can obfuscate a URL by registering a domain name that looks like a real domain. One
example is registering a domain to look like Microsoft.com. An attacker registers Micros0ft.com
where the second “o” is a zero. When spelled out it looks silly and nobody would go to the site,
but if the bad domain were in an email listed in all caps it looks like this: MICROS0FT.com. If
the attacker manipulated the fonts or the text sizes this domain can look real. In the standard
ASCII characters there are characters that look similar such as upper case “i” and a lower case “L”
or even a “1”. Example: “Il1” is and “i” a “L” and a one. Ollman also mentions that there are
characters in other languages that are similar to the English or Standard ASCII characters. He
cites the use of the ASCII “o” and the Cyrillic “o” [20].
Another way to obfuscate a domain name is to use a sub-domain. A sub-domain is added to the
front of a web address. If Microsoft had a sub domain called “customer service” the domain
name would like: www.customerservice.microsoft.com. The employment of sub-domains is easy
for an attacker to do since sub-domains are not registered—a domain administrator creates them.
If an attacker owns the domain bankfraudalert.com and sets up that domain for phishing, the
attacker can make the URL look legitimate such as www.bankofamerica.bankfraudalert.com.
Even greater sub-domain obfuscation can make the URL look real by adding a .com to the URL.
In this the URL looks like: “www.bankofamerical.com.bankfraudalert.com.” The first instance of
the .com is actually a sub-domain.
3.4.2 Third-party shortened URLs
URLs for legitimate purposes have grown to some unmanageable lengths due to URLs containing
multiple sub domains, deep folder structures, and search strings included in the URLs. This
creates a need for third party vendors to assist with shortening URLs. The most common are
smallurl.com and tinyurl.com. These providers do the opposite of what DNS does, they take a
long common language URL and shorten it using characters that cannot be read by a person.
Databases on their servers correlate the shortened URL to its common long URL. These services
did not intend to create a product to be used by phishers, but the side effects of their product are
that they have a great tool for scammers. A scammer does not need to come up with clever ways
to spoof a real domain name. The scammer can use the third-party tool for site obfuscation. A
good scammer will still use a spoof name, but the third-party obfuscation adds a level of
complexity and believability to the scam. In the original use of the spoofed Microsoft domain
(Micros0ft.com) the scammer registers the domain with the third party and the domain look
similar to this: http://tinyurl.com/7h6kndc. Tiny URL even has an aliasing service that allows a
person to change the suffix to whatever they want. The same URL listed above (which was
www.microsoft.com/customerservice) was changed to:
“http://tinyurl.com/BankofAmericafraudcomplaints.” This technique hides the original domain
name and appears to be something that it isn’t.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

3.4.3 Host name obfuscation
Computers can be very accommodating with regard to formatting host names. Accommodating
the user under the pretext of computer friendliness also makes an attacker’s job easier through
host name obfuscation. Host names can be entered using DNS, in Decimal, Dword, Hexadecimal
and sometimes a mixture of all of them adding a level of complexity and layer of confusion.
Technicalinfo.net gives a great example for Host name obfuscation [21]:
These alternative formats are best explained using an example. Consider the URL:
http://www.evilsite.com/, resolving to 210.134.161.35. This can be interpreted as:
· Decimal – http://210.134.161.35/
· Dword – http:// 3532038435/
· Octal – http://0322.0206.0241.0043/
· Hexadecimal – http://0xD2.0x86.0xA1.0x23/ or even http://0xD286A123/
· In some cases, it may be possible to mix formats (e.g. http://0322.0×86.161.0043/).
DNS was invented so that users would not have to translate obfuscated host names.
Unfortunately it is necessary to allow network to be flexible in its addressing. An attacker can
take the mixing of the formats further and make a site look more legitimate such as
http://210.134.161.35/BankofAmerica/fraudepartment.
Note: Even Microsoft Word acknowledged most of the above web addresses as valid while
writing this paper before hyperlinks were removed.
3.5 Cross-site Scripting Attacks
Cross-site Scripting (known as CSS and XSS) is a method where an attacker manipulates and
exploits insecure coding or poor coding of a website allowing the attacker to inject malicious
code, such as a Trojan or key logger, for collection of data. The pie-chart below, created by the
Web Hacking Incident Database for 2011 (WHID) shows SQL injection and XSS are the most
popular attack vectors on web sites. Adding to this, some of the other attack methods on the chart
can be as a result of XSS attacks
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure 6. Cross Site Scripting [22] The most common method used by phishers using XSS isto exploit a website that allows
comments on its content. The XSS code is placed into the comments field and auto executes
every time the page is loaded by a victim.
4.ATTACK BREAKDOWN
4.1 Dissecting the Phish
Figure 7 below shows a random representation from an email spam folder. The email shows
some tell-tale signs of a Phishing scam.
The original email is sent from CreditScoresNow@Hallcow.com but is showing its name as
Equifax. This is not even a good attempt at URL obfuscation by bad domain name. An email
from Equifax should come from Equifax.com. The entire body of the text is actually a picture
with a hyperlink. Attackers do this to circumvent text scannerslooking for typical phishing
attacks. At the bottom of the email there are two links for unsubscribe. The links go to the same
server, but different sub-domains. Also, the host names are very long and contain numbers. This
is an example of URL Hostname Obfuscation.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure 7 Phishing Example
5.EMERGING ATTACK VECTORS
Since the days of AOL’s dominance and the immaturity of both the internet and its users, attacks
have changed to match internet trends. Users are more aware of classic scams and detection and
prevention technologies are developed to counter the methods of the attacker. Attackers
deviously modify their techniques to continue to fool both people and technology. Listed below
are some emerging attack vectors and new targets of opportunity for phishers.
5.1 Social Media
Social media is an excellent source of information for a spear phisher. Facebook and Twitter
have become online diaries of people’s lives. Diaries used to be secured by lock and key so that
little brothers would not read little sister’s thoughts. Now these thoughts are broadcast for the
entire world to see in real time. Attackers can use this information to construct target phishing
scams using information from a person’s profile on Facebook. Some people even have their
email and phone number posted as part of their profiles giving a scammerinformation needed for
email phishing or smishing.
Facebook is also vulnerable to XSS. According to Acunetix, “Something as simple as a
Facebook post on your wall can contain a malicious script, which if not filtered by the Facebook
servers will be injected into your Wall and execute on the browser of every person who visits
your Facebook profile” [23].
5.2 SMS
SMS stands for Short Message Service. SMS is basis for cellular phone texting. Cellular phones
are now web enabled, and have become targets for an attack called Smishing. Attack vectors
present in email messages are now being migrated to text messages. Attackers are using an
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

update of an old technique called war dialing. In the classic sense an attacker used a computer
modem to automatically call a list (or all of them in an area code) of phone numbers and record
which numbers responded as computers or fax machines. The current scam is to use war dialing
to look for cellular numbers and then send out a mass message that directs the recipient to a
malicious website.
Note:Wardialing is also being used for Vishing scams as well.Below is an example of a
Smishing attempt.

Figure 9. SMISHING
The website http://testipad3.co was registered by GoDaddy.com and was taken down the next day.
The attack vector in this case was a reward. The message corresponds with the release of Apple’s
Ipad III.
5.3 Craigslist
Scams have scams on both the buyer and seller sides of a transaction. Both types of scams
require breaking Craigslist’s recommended policy of not completing a transaction in person.
5.3.1 Buyer Side Transaction
A trending fraud on the seller side of Craigslist transactions is for house rentals. A phisher will
post an ad for house rental on Craigslist and will even include pictures of the house and give and
address. The phisher “hooks” the phish, or victim, by offering an incredibly low rent on the
house. The victim responds quickly to the offer to lock in the deal. The person offering the rental
asks the victim for a security deposit to ensure that the victim gets the rental. The deal is never
made and the victim never gets their deposit back.
Author’s note:This exact scam happened to the step-sister of one of the authors.
5.3.2 Seller Side Transaction
In a seller side phishing scam, the victim is the seller. A prospected buyer typically offers more
than a seller is asking for on a deal, but the catch is that the buyer wants the item shipped. Below
is a sample of a Craigslist scam. This particular scam shows some classic psychology of the
Phisher. This message not only offers more money, but is appealing to the seller and the seller’s
trust by stating that the person is doing relief work in Haiti.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure 10. Craigslist Example [24] 6.RISK REDUCTION AND MITIGATION
The risks of Phishing or any other information security vulnerability can be reduced or mitigated,
but never eliminated. Risk reduction begins at the senior management level of an organization.
Placing appropriate emphasis on IT security at the senior management and board of director’s
level is the first step toward minimizing system breaches. By establishing effective policies and
procedures, boards of directors can promote an atmosphere that addresses critical security areas
and establishes appropriate guidelines and standards for all employees. [25] Senior management needs to have buy-in on security programs and fully fund them.
6.1 Training
Training is a key ingredient to making people aware of phishing scams. In addition to an
awareness program, there is an online tool available through Carnegie Melon University and
WombatSecurity.com. It is called Phishing Phil. It is a flash game that incorporates recognizing
many of the attack vectors in this paper in a fun way. Phishing Phil requires a license, but is
worth the investment.
6.2 Trojaned Hosts
The best defense against Trojans is to actively scan the machine for viruses with an up-to-date
virus scanner. Virus scanners will catch most Trojans that are not zero-day exploits or custom
variants. A virus scanner is only as good as its definitions. A zero-day exploit is an exploit that
has not been identified or patched. Anti-virus programs rely on signatures for detection and if a
Trojan is new there will not be a signature in anti-virus database. Trojans also exploit
vulnerabilities in operating systems and application such as Java, Adobe Reader, and Flash.
Keeping the operating system and applications at their most recent patch level reduces the
exposure level of the system.
6.3 Man-in-the-Middle Attacks
6.3.1 Transparent Proxy Servers
Transparent Proxy servers are difficult to detect. There are some third party proxy detectors
available. It is good practice to employ a proxy detector even if phishing is not suspected since
the main purpose of a proxy is circumvention of firewall rules.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

6.3.2 DNS Cache Poisoning
The first line of defense against DNS Cache Poisoning in an enterprise is ensuring that your DNS
servers are properly configured and at a current patch level. Microsoft Servers offer DNS
Protection for what Microsoft calls DNS polluting. “By default, Microsoft DNS servers, using
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or later, acting as a parent in a child-parent relationship will fully
perform cache pollution protection” [26].
Netcraft also offers a tool for detecting DNS poisoning. It is called the Netcraft toolbar. The
Netcraft tool bar works by conducting a geographic lookup of the destination IP and displaying it
on the webpage see below.

Figure 11.Netcraft
The Netcraft toolbar shows the risk rating of the website, the age of the website, the host location
and whether or not there were ever frauds detected on the same site. Netcraft describes the
functionality as “if your local DNS cache was poisoned such that the US Bank web site
(http://www.usbank.com) pointed to an IP address located in Russia, then the toolbar would
report the site as being located in Russia” [28].
6.3.3 Browser Proxy Configuration
In an enterprise environment where computers are in a client/server relationship in a domain, the
permissions for browsers proxy should default to prohibited by the group policy. This adds a
layer of protection and makes it difficult for an attacker to add a proxy since they would have to
also override policy. For machines that are not part of a domain, a user should inspect the
browser setting at a set interval.
6.4 URL Obfuscation
6.4.1 Bad Domain Names
Mitigating bad domain names via URL Obfuscation is accomplished by not trusting URLs that
are provided. Users should not follow provided links rather type them in to the address or search
bar themselves.

6.4.2 Third Party Shortened URLs
Third parties that offer URL shortening are aware of the misuse of their products and have added
functionality. TinyURL.com has a preview feature that discloses the redirected site. Figure
12.Uses the early example of www.tinyurl.com/bankofamericafraudcomplaints.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

Figure 12. Tiny URL
The preview feature is enacted by appending the original link with the word “preview”. An
organization should train its employees to always preview any third-party shortened URLs.
Using the example, the URL is: www.preview.tinyurl.com/bankofamericafraudcomplaints.
6.4.3 Host Name Obfuscation
The defense against host name obfuscation is to set a policy to not use obfuscated host names.
This is similar to never using bad domain names. A user should always type in the common
FQDN.
6.5 Cross-Site Scripting Attacks
Preventing XSS attacks requires diligence when code is created. Special attention is needed to
ensure that a webpage is not vulnerable. There are tools available that check web applications for
these vulnerabilities in code. Unfortunately these tools are also available to criminals. Typically
a coder will create a filter that does not allow certain words to be added to a comment such as
“<script>”. This is a simple example on coding to prevent XSS. Actual rules and methods of
prevention are outside the scope of this paper. Another way to mitigate the XSS is to have a
penetration team routinely attempt XSS injection attacks. If your penetration can execute a XSS
so can an attacker.
Having a well coded website is great, but it does not stop the common user from being exploited
by the XSS codes. On the client side there are steps that can be taken to limit the effects of XSS.
The first is through policy. Most organizations have a security policy limiting the use of the
internet. Next is to ensure all computers are properly patched at the Operating System level and
the Application level. Lastly, browsers can be configured to limit the ability to execute scripts on
website. This however plays with the balance of productivity and security.
7.CONCLUSION
A solid awareness program keeps IA professionals and SAs abreast of techniques of phishers by
being informative and relevant to classic and emerging attack vectors and methodologies to
mitigate the risks. Good SAs keep the balance between security and productivity by knowing
what is dangerous to the organization and what is not. This paper discussed the history of
phishing from ancient Troy to AOL of the 1990s, Classic Phishing attack Vectors, Emerging
Attack Vectors and processes to mitigate and limit the risks of phishing. The important aspect of
phishing training is keeping the audience engaged. Providing historical examples of social
engineering and phishing combined with technical examples of common attacks enforces the
retention of the training materials.
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013

References:
[1] APWG.org (2011) Phishing trends report. [Online]. Available:
http://docs.apwg.org/reports/APWG_GlobalPhishingSurvey_2H2012.pdf . Page 5.
[2] Rudd, J (2008) Critical companion to Dante: a literary reference to his life and work. Facts on File
publishing. New York, NY. Page 515.
[3] McGlasson, L (2008) Social Engineering: How to beat the bad guys. [Online]. Available:
http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=680
[4] McFredies, P (n.d.) Phising. [Online]. Available: http://www.wordspy.com/words/phishing.asp.
[5] Kay, R (2004) Sidebar: The Origins of Phishing. [Online]. Available:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/89097/Sidebar_The_Origins_of_Phishing.
[6] Retrojunk.com (n.d.) America Online. Retrieved on Feb 8, 2012 from www.RetroJunk.com/images/artimages/
aol4d.jpg
[7] AOLWatch.org (n.d.) AOHell v3.0 rage against the machine. Retrieved on Jan 29, 2012 from
http://www.aolwatch.org/chronic2.htm.
[8] Rekouche, K (n.d.) Fisher. Retrieved on Feb 21, 2012 from http://pushstart.info/phishing.html
[9] Garfinkel, S. (1995) AOHELL. Retrieved on Feb 6, 2012 from
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk.Risks/17.10.html#subj3.
[10] Kay, R (2004) Sidebar: The Origins of Phishing. [Online]. Available:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/89097/Sidebar_The_Origins_of_Phishing.
[11] Lavasoft.com ( 2011) LavaSoft news. Retrieved on Feb 24, 2012 from
http://www.lavasoft.com/company/newsletter/2011/04/article_understanding_social_engineering.php
[12] USU.com (n.d.) Vergil. [Online]. Available:

Click to access 112verg.pdf

[13] Techtarget.com (2010) Definition: Zeus Trojan (Zbot). [Online]. Available:
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/Zeus-Trojan-Zbot
[14] Savage, M (2009) Zeus trojan evades antivirus software. [Online]. Available:
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/security-bytes/zeus-trojan-evades-antivirus-software-trusteersays/
[15] ContentVerification.com (2012) Step 4. Man-in-the-middle. [Online]. Available:
http://contententverification.com/man-in-the-middle/
[16] Techtarget.com (2010) Definition: Zeus Trojan (Zbot). [Online]. Available:
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/Zeus-Trojan-Zbot
[17] TCT Solutions (2011) DNS Cache Poisoning. [Online]. Available: http://tct-solutions.com/wpcontent/
uploads/2011/10/dns-cache-poisoning.png
[18] Ollmann, G (2007). The phishing guide understanding and preventing phishing attacks. [Online].
Available: http://www.technicalinfo.net/papers/Phishing.html
[19] RSA.com (2007) RSA Alert: new universal man-in-the-middle phishing kit discovered. [Online].
Available: http://www.rsa.com/press_release.aspx?id=7667
[20] Ollmann, G (2007). The phishing guide understanding and preventing phishing attacks. [Online].
Available: http://www.technicalinfo.net/papers/Phishing.html
[21] Ollmann, G (2007). The phishing guide understanding and preventing phishing attacks. [Online].
Available: http://www.technicalinfo.net/papers/Phishing.html. Page 8.
[22] Acunix.com (2012) Cross site scripting attacks. [Online]. Available:
http://www.acunetix.com/websitesecurity/cross-site-scripting
[23] Acunix.com (2012) Cross site scripting attacks. [Online]. Available:
http://www.acunetix.com/websitesecurity/cross-site-scripting.htm.
[24] MollerMarketing.com (2010) Craigslist scams revisited: 5 main scam indicators. [Online]. Available:
http://mollermarketing.com/2010/05/30/craigslist-scams-revisited-5-main-scam-indicators/)
[25] McGlasson, L (2008) Social Engineering: How to beat the bad guys. [Online]. Available:
http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=680
[26] Microsoft.com (2007) How to prevent DNS pollution. [Online]. Available:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/241352
[27] Netcraft.com (n.d.) Ballons 2. [Online]. Available: http://news.netcraft.com/wpcontent/
uploads/2010/05/baloons2.jpg
[28] Miller, R(2005). DNS poising scam raises awareness of pharming. [Online]. Available:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/03/07/dns_poisoning_scam_raises_wariness_of_pharming.html)
[29] Stanford.edu, (n.d.) Mortal women of the Trojan war. [Online]. Available:
http://www.stanford.edu/~plomio/cassandra.html
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013
40
[30] Henderson, James and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); ” Working Virtually and Challenges that must be
overcome in today’s Economic Downturn”; International Jyournal of Managing Information Technology
(IJMIT); ISSN : 0975-5586 (Online) ;0975-5926 (Print)
[31] Dreelin, S., Gregory and Rahman, Syed (Shawon);“ Enterprise Security Risk Plan for Small Business”;
International Jyournal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC), ISSN : 0974 – 9322 [Online] ;
0975- 2293 [Print])
[32] Donahue, Kimmarie and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Healthcare IT: Is yyour Information at Risk?”;
International Jyournal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.4, No.5, September 2012,
ISSN:0974-9330(online); 0975-
[33] Rice, Lee and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Non-Profit Organizations’ need to Address Security for Effective
Government Contracting”; International Jyournal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.4,
No.4, July 2012
[34] Neal, David and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Video Surveillance in the Cloud?”; The International Jyournal
of Cryptography and Information Security (IJCIS), Vol.2, No.3, September 2012
[35] Halton, Michael and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “The Top 10 Best Cloud-Security Practices in Next-
Generation Networking”; International Jyournal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems
(IJCNDS); Special Issue on: “Recent Advances in Next-Generation and Resyource-Constrained Converged
Networks”, Vol. 8, Nos. ½, 2012, Pages:70-84, ISSN: 1754-3916
[36] Amin, Syed; Pathan, Al-Sakib, and Rahman, Syed (Shawon);” Special Issue on Recent Advances in Next-
Generation and Resyource-Constrained Converged Networks” , International Jyournal of Communication
Networks and Distributed Systems (IJCNDS)
[37] Mohr, Stephen and Rahman, Syed (Shawon);“IT Security Issues within the Video Game Industry”;
International Jyournal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT), Vol 3, No 5, Oct 2011,
ISSN:0975-3826
[38] Dees, Kyle and Rahman, Syed (Shawon);“Enhancing Infrastructure Security in Real Estate”; International
Jyournal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC), Vol.3, No.6, Nov. 2011
[39] Hood, David and Rahman, Syed (Shawon);“IT Security Plan for Flight Simulation Program”; International
Jyournal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (IJCSEA), Vol.1, No.5, October 2011
[40] Schuett, Maria and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Information Security Synthesis in Online Universities”;
International Jyournal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.3, No.5, Sep 2011
[41] Jungck, Kathleen and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); ” Cloud Computing Avoids Downfall of Application
Service Providers”; International Jyournal of Information Technology Convergence and services (IJITCS),
Vol.1, No.3, June 2011
[42] Slaughter, Jason and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); ” Information Security Plan for Flight Simulator
Applications”; International Jyournal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT), Vol. 3, No
3, June 2011
[43] Benson, Karen and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Security Risks in Mechanical Engineering Industries”,
International Jyournal of Computer Science and Engineering Survey (IJCSES), Vol.2, No.3, August 2011
[44] Bisong, Anthony and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “An Overview of the Security Concerns in Enterprise
Cloud Computing “; International jyournal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.3, No.1,
January 2011
[45] Mullikin, Aryoun and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “The Ethical Dilemma of the USA Government
Wiretapping”; International Jyournal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT); Vol.2, No.4,
November 2010
[46] Rahman, Syed (Shawon) and Donahue, Shannon; “Convergence of Corporate and Information Security”;
International Jyournal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 7, No. 1, 2010
[47] Hailu, Alemayehu and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Protection, Motivation, and Deterrence: Key Drivers and
Barriers of Organizational Adoption of Security Practices” ; IEEE the 7th International Conference on
Electrical and Computer Engineering (ICECE) December 20-22, 2012, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[48] Hailu, Alemayehu and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Security Concerns for Youb-based Research Survey”
IEEE the 7th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (ICECE), December 20-22,
2012, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[49] Neal, David and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Consider video surveillance in the cloud-computing”; IEEE the
7th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (ICECE), December 20-22, 2012,
Dhaka, Bangladesh
[50] Neal, David and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Securing Systems after Deployment”; The Third International
Conference on Communications Security & Information Assurance (CSIA 2012), May 25-27, 2012, Delhi,
India
[51] Johnson, Mazie and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); “Healthcare System’s Operational Security”; IEEE 2011
14th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), Dhaka, Bangladesh,
December 22-24, 2011
International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA), Vol.5, No.4, July 2013
41
[52] Rahman, Syed (Shawon) “System Security Specifications for a Multi-disciplinary Research Project”,7th
International Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems conjunction with The 33rd
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2011), May 21-28, 2011, Honolulu,
Hawaii.
[53] Rahman, Syed (Shawon) and Donahue, Shannon; “Converging Physical and Information Security Risk
Management”, Executive Action Series, The Conference Board, Inc. 845 Third Avenue, New York, New
York 10022-6679, United States
[54] Rahman, Syed (Shawon) and Peterson, Mike; “Security Specifications for a Multi-disciplinary Research
Project”; The 2011 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice (SERP’11),
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA July 18-21, 2011
[55] Jungck, Kathleen and Rahman, Syed (Shawon); ” Information Security Policy Concerns as Case Law Shifts
toward Balance betyouen Employer Security and Employee Privacy”; The 2011 International Conference
on Security and Management (SAM 2011), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA July 18-21, 2011
Authors Bio:
Marc Rader is a CISSP earning his B.S. degree in Information System Management from
Park University in 2009 and his M.S. degree in Information Technology: Information
Assurance and Security from Capella University in 2012. Currently, he is pursuing his PhD in
Information Technology: Information Assurance at Capella University. Mr. Rader works as an
Associate Faculty Member at Cochise College in Arizona and Network Engineer for TASC Inc.
Dr. Syed (Shawon) M. Rahman is an Associate professor in the Department of Computer
Science and Engineering at the University of Hawaii-Hilo, Hawaii, USA and a part-time
faculty of School of Business and Information Technology at the Capella University,
Minneapolis, MN. Dr. Rahman’s research interests include software engineering education,
data visualization, information assurance a nd security, digital forensics, cloud computing
security, web accessibility, software testing and quality assurance. He has published more than
90 peer-reviewed articles. He is a member of many professionalorganizations including IEEE, ACM, ASEE,
ASQ, ISACA, and UPE.